华硕 ROG Zephyrus GX501 笔记本电脑简短评测

👁️ 8863 ❤️ 248
华硕 ROG Zephyrus GX501 笔记本电脑简短评测

华硕 ROG Zephyrus GX501 笔记本电脑简短评测厌食症 2.0。 华硕又一次推出了最薄的设备。至今为止。这次我们测试的是ROG Zephyrus GX501游戏本。尽管它的厚度只有17.9毫米,这台15寸笔记本电脑搭配了英特尔酷睿i7四核处理器和采用新“Max-Q”设计的英伟达GTX 1080显卡。请阅读我们对这台超薄游戏本的详尽测试了解更多。Florian Glaser, Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 07/01/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇳🇱 🇹🇷 🇭🇺 🇮🇹 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇫🇷 Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

Asus Zephyrus GX501 (Zephyrus GX501 Series)ProcessorIntel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby LakeGraphics adapterNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1227 MHz, RAM: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 382.22Memory24 GB , 8 GB 板载+ 16 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, 双通道Display15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 120赫兹,G-Sync,全高清, glossy: noMainboardIntel HM175StorageSamsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, 1024 GB , 三星 SM961 固态硬盘 (MZVKW1T0HMLH-00000), 1 TB PCIe 3.0 x4, M.2 Type 2280SoundcardRealtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio ControllerConnections4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机和麦克风整合接口(3.5毫米), Brightness SensorNetworkingIntel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 17 x 379 x 262Battery50 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4芯Operating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Pro 64 BitCameraWebcam: 高清Additional featuresSpeakers: 2.0, Keyboard: 孤岛式,RGB背光, Keyboard Light: yes, 230瓦电源适配器,质保信息,快速开始说明,螺丝刀,USB 3.0到RJ45以太网转接器,橡胶质感掌托,Strix Impact游戏鼠标, 一些生产商工具软件,XSplit Gamecaster试用版, 24 Months WarrantyWeight2.25 kg, Power Supply: 670 g

Price3000 EURLinksAsus homepageAsus notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus G701VIK-BA049T Alienware 15 R3 SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO Asus FX502VM-AS73 MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Asus Zephyrus GX501 Gigabyte Aero 15 DIN A4 ❌

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

Left side: Power, HDMI 2.0, 2x USB 3.0 (1x with charge), 3.5 mm stereo jack

Right side: Thunderbolt 3 (incl. DisplayPort & USB 3.1 Gen. 2), 2x USB 3.0, slot for Kensington Lock

Networking

iperf3 transmit AX12MSI GS63VR 7RF-228USKiller Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter

594 MBit/s +44%Alienware 15 R3Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter

560 MBit/s +36%SCHENKER XMG P507 PROIntel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265

513 MBit/s +24%Asus FX502VM-AS73Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260

513 MBit/s +24%Asus Zephyrus GX501Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265

413 MBit/s Gigabyte Aero 15Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265

346 MBit/s -16% iperf3 receive AX12Asus Zephyrus GX501Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265

683 MBit/s Alienware 15 R3Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter

681 MBit/s 0%Gigabyte Aero 15Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265

678 MBit/s -1%SCHENKER XMG P507 PROIntel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265

674 MBit/s -1%MSI GS63VR 7RF-228USKiller Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter

662 MBit/s -3%Asus FX502VM-AS73Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260

541 MBit/s -21%

313cd/m²320cd/m²305cd/m²325cd/m²328cd/m²325cd/m²278cd/m²279cd/m²272cd/m²

Distribution of brightnessAUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 328 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 305 cd/m² Minimum: 37 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 83 %Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²Contrast: 1312:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.02 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.32 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)91.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.28CCT: 8194 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Asus Zephyrus GX501AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), 1920x1080Alienware 15 R3HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), 1920x1080SCHENKER XMG P507 PROAUO B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080Asus FX502VM-AS731920x1080Gigabyte Aero 15N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), 1920x1080MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US3840x2160Display0%-1%-40%1%-24% Display P3 Coverage64.866 2%66.4 2%38.28 -41%65.2 1%48.21 -26% sRGB Coverage91.890.5 -1%88.9 -3%56.9 -38%92.5 1%72.6 -21% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage65.966.2 0%65.1 -1%39.47 -40%66.5 1%49.81 -24%Response Times44%46%19%-20%17% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *40.4 ?(23.2, 17.2)25 ?(12, 13) 38%24 ?(12, 12) 41%28.4 ?(11.2, 17.2) 30%42.8 ?(23.6, 19.2) -6%28 ?(15.6, 12.4) 31% Response Time Black / White *24 ?(11.6, 12.4)12 ?(4, 8) 50%12 ?(4, 8) 50%22.4 ?(6, 16.4) 7%32 ?(18.8, 13.2) -33%23.6 ?(15.2, 8.4) 2% PWM Frequency26000 ?(20)1351 ?(39)Screen-23%-30%-39%-3%-32%Brightness middle328386 18%357 9%209.5 -36%320 -2%274.2 -16%Brightness305382 25%365 20%205 -33%316 4%263 -14%Brightness Distribution8393 12%85 2%92 11%90 8%92 11%Black Level *0.250.39 -56%0.5 -100%0.69 -176%0.36 -44%0.44 -76%Contrast1312990 -25%714 -46%304 -77%889 -32%623 -53%Colorchecker dE 2000 *6.0210.2 -69%9.93 -65%4.7 22%4.62 23%8 -33%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *10.1415.81 -56%14.87 -47%19.7 -94%9.75 4%14.6 -44%Greyscale dE 2000 *6.3211.28 -78%10.32 -63%1.8 72%6 5%9.1 -44%Gamma2.28 96%2.23 99%2.11 104%2.23 99%2.46 89%2.24 98%CCT8194 79%11383 57%10096 64%6975 93%6761 96%5020 129%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)6059 -2%58 -3%36.2 -40%60 0%45.7 -24%Color Space (Percent of sRGB)9290 -2%89 -3%56.6 -38%92 0%72.1 -22%Total Average (Program / Settings)7% /

-10%5% /

-14%-20% /

-31%-7% /

-5%-13% /

-24%* ... smaller is better

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise↘ 12.4 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.2 ms rise↘ 17.2 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit11462

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit22470

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit6015

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit67.7 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit1.82 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit8.15 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit160 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit101 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit735 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)1765 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)382 Points

Help... in comparison

Cinebench R15

CPU Single 64BitGigabyte Aero 15Intel Core i7-7700HQ

161 Points +1%Asus Zephyrus GX501Intel Core i7-7700HQ

160 Points Asus Strix GL702VSKIntel Core i7-7700HQ

159 Points -1%Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71Intel Core i7-7700HQ

148 Points -7%MSI GE72 7RE-046Intel Core i7-7700HQ

145 Points -9% CPU Multi 64BitGigabyte Aero 15Intel Core i7-7700HQ

742 Points +1%Asus Strix GL702VSKIntel Core i7-7700HQ

736 Points 0%Asus Zephyrus GX501Intel Core i7-7700HQ

735 Points MSI GE72 7RE-046Intel Core i7-7700HQ

732 Points 0%Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71Intel Core i7-7700HQ

732 Points 0%

PCMark 8

Home Score Accelerated v2Asus G701VIK-BA049TGeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)

5662 Points +12%Alienware 17 R4GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB

5064 Points 0%Asus Zephyrus GX501GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH

5057 Points Asus Strix GL702VSKGeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630

4787 Points -5%Gigabyte Aero 15GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11

4248 Points -16%MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth ProGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e

4060 Points -20%Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)Radeon Pro 555, i7-7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L

4054 Points -20%Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630

3770 Points -25%Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzHD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256

2550 Points -50% Work Score Accelerated v2Asus G701VIK-BA049TGeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)

5846 Points +11%Gigabyte Aero 15GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11

5290 Points 0%Asus Zephyrus GX501GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH

5289 Points Alienware 17 R4GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB

5088 Points -4%MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth ProGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e

4859 Points -8%Asus Strix GL702VSKGeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630

4782 Points -10%Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630

4680 Points -12%Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)Radeon Pro 555, i7-7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L

4648 Points -12%Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzHD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256

3550 Points -33%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2

5057 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2

5289 pointsPCMark 10 Score

5125 pointsHelp

3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Asus G701VIK-BA049TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7820HK

31412 Points +33%Alienware 17 R4NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7820HK

26438 Points +12%Aorus X7 v6 AO-S107Q716-PL-005NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6820HK

23633 Points 0%Asus Zephyrus GX501NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

23540 Points Asus Strix GL702VSKNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

22825 Points -3%MSI GT62VR 7RE-223NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

22704 Points -4%Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

22510 Points -4%HP Omen 17-w110ngNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ

20656 Points -12%MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth ProNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ

15075 Points -36%Gigabyte Aero 15NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

14265 Points -39%MSI GE72 7RE-046NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

10186 Points -57%Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

7457 Points -68%Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

5185 Points -78%Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzIntel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30

1186 Points -95%3DMark

1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAsus G701VIK-BA049TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7820HK

142135 Points +24%Alienware 17 R4NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7820HK

132575 Points +16%Aorus X7 v6 AO-S107Q716-PL-005NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6820HK

119165 Points +4%Asus Zephyrus GX501NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

114542 Points MSI GT62VR 7RE-223NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

97501 Points -15%Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

94246 Points -18%HP Omen 17-w110ngNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ

86780 Points -24%Gigabyte Aero 15NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

77755 Points -32%Asus Strix GL702VSKNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

73454 Points -36%MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth ProNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ

69253 Points -40%MSI GE72 7RE-046NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

49223 Points -57%Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

37840 Points -67%Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

22624 Points -80%Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzIntel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30

6078 Points -95%1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAsus G701VIK-BA049TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7820HK

23091 Points +27%Alienware 17 R4NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7820HK

21846 Points +20%Aorus X7 v6 AO-S107Q716-PL-005NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6820HK

18705 Points +3%Asus Zephyrus GX501NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

18219 Points MSI GT62VR 7RE-223NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

17477 Points -4%Asus Strix GL702VSKNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

17131 Points -6%Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

16847 Points -8%HP Omen 17-w110ngNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ

15806 Points -13%MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth ProNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ

11730 Points -36%Gigabyte Aero 15NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

11173 Points -39%MSI GE72 7RE-046NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

8086 Points -56%Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

6013 Points -67%Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ

3721 Points -80%Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzIntel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30

735 Points -96%3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Vantage P Result

39562 points3DMark 11 Performance

16821 points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score

140964 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score

27935 points3DMark Fire Strike Score

14260 points3DMark Time Spy Score

5390 pointsHelp... in comparison

The Witcher 3 ultra

lowmed.highultraQHD4KThe Witcher 3 (2015)

118

61.9

43.7

Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)

124

88

48

Star Wars Battlefront (2015)

164

144

55.6

Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015)

74.4

50.3

40

Rainbow Six Siege (2015)

197

172

65.7

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)

125

105

43.6

Far Cry Primal (2016)

92

87

41

The Division (2016)

107

83.8

40.8

Doom (2016)

134

128

53.9

Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)

106

97.8

38.8

Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)

87.3

47.9

29.6

Battlefield 1 (2016)

130

113

49

Titanfall 2 (2016)

131

113

46.6

Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)

123

118

63.7

Dishonored 2 (2016)

78.2

66.5

43.4

Watch Dogs 2 (2016)

86.7

66.7

34.9

Resident Evil 7 (2017)

166

140

47.4

For Honor (2017)

155

115

47.9

Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)

86.7

51.9

34.1

Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)

81.4

73.2

35.1

Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017)

88

86

41.9

Prey (2017)

135

131

50.5

Rocket League (2017)

235

103

Dirt 4 (2017)

136

88.4

Team Fortress 2 (2017)

124

125

Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)

125

111

104

79

27.1

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

130

86

64

27.2

Far Cry New Dawn (2019)

66

38

Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)

75

55.9

33.7

The Division 2 (2019)

74

51.5

27.8

League of Legends (2019)

145

144

Noise Level

Idle

32 / 33 / 34 dB(A)Load

39 / 46 dB(A)

30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud

min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31 dB(A)

Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3

57 °C56 °C56 °C 52 °C54 °C49 °C 42 °C41 °C40 °C

Maximum: 57 °CAverage: 49.7 °C

47 °C46 °C54 °C42 °C43 °C48 °C41 °C42 °C42 °C

Maximum: 54 °CAverage: 45 °C Power Supply (max.) 48 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3

31 °C31 °C30 °C 32 °C32 °C30 °C 31 °C30 °C29 °C

Maximum: 32 °CAverage: 30.7 °C

29 °C30 °C30 °C30 °C31 °C31 °C30 °C31 °C31 °C

Maximum: 31 °CAverage: 30.3 °C Power Supply (max.) 33 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3

53 °C53 °C53 °C 49 °C50 °C47 °C 40 °C40 °C36 °C

Maximum: 53 °CAverage: 46.8 °C

44 °C43 °C52 °C41 °C41 °C45 °C39 °C40 °C40 °C

Maximum: 52 °CAverage: 42.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 44 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).

Asus Zephyrus GX501 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 46% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Aero 15 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 40% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.7 / 0.9 WattIdle 18 / 23 / 31 Watt

Load

79 / 196 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

3h 08min

WiFi Websurfing

2h 10min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

2h 12min

Load (maximum brightness)

0h 44min

In review: ROG Zephyrus GX501. Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.在我们实际使用这台设备一段不长的时间之后,我们已经可以感受到它超薄机身设计带来的一些缺点。它的键盘和GTX 1080 Max-Q显卡都受到了不小的挑战。我们的第一批测试结果显示它的性能更接近高分GTX 1070显卡而非GTX 1080。从我们的角度来看,它的散热系统可以说相对安静,噪音最高值达到了40 dB(A),在接下来的详尽测试后我们将会得到更确切的结果。在屏幕的方面我们也同样需要进一步的测试,尽管它提供了120赫兹刷新率和雾面设计。

目前我们预计它的完整测试将会在下周更新,敬请期待!

(更新:详尽测试已完成!)

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。

More articles related to this deviceAsus Zephyrus GX501 (Zephyrus GX501 Series)

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1853 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

← 詹姆斯的偶像是谁 电源报价 →